Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:63460 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11655 of 2025 Petitioner :- Brij Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amar Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The writ petition has been filed for the following relief:
"Issue a writ order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 to decide the Case No. 6314 of 2022, Computerized No.T202214360106314 (Gaon Sabha Vs Baijnath) under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously or within the stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner is neither a party to the aforesaid proceedings nor a person aggrieved, therefore, the writ petition at his behest is not maintainable.
4. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad