APHC010870562017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36343/2017 Between: 1. P. MAHENDRA, NELLORE, S/O. P. INDRASENA NAIDU, AGED 57 YEARS, OCC: MMS-II/ DEPUTY MANAGER (UNDER SUSPENSION), SBI, CHITTOOR MAIN BRANCH, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, R/O. H.NO. 27-6-185, OPP SRI VIVEKANANDA VIDYALAYA, AC NAGAR, NELLORE- 524 002. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GENERAL MANAGER S B I HYD ANO, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, AMARAVATI CIRCLE, GUNFOUNDRY, HYDERABAD - 500 001 2. STATE BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS DGM/DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATHI -517501. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of CERTIORARI (a) to call for the records relates to and connected with the letter No. V1G/TPT/MSK/1608 dated 11.10.2017 of the 1st respondent communicated through the 2nd respondent vide letter dated 12.10.2017 and quash or set aside the same holding it as arbitrary, illegal and violation of principal of natural justice apart from being in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. (b) consequently direct the respondents not to proceed further in pursuance to letter No. VIG/TPT/MSK/1608 dated 11.10.2017 of the 1st respondent communicated through the 2nd respondent vide letter dated 12.10.2017. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K S V SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY 2. B S PRASAD The Court made the following: 3 Order: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sir B. Sudhakar Rao, learned counsel representing Sri K. S. V. Subba Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J. Date:31.12.2025 ARB/JAK 4 19 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO:36343 of 2017 Date:31.12.2025 ARB/JAK