Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:62181 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12465 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dharmdev Rajbhar Respondent :- Rajya Uttar Pradesh Dwara Pramukh Sachiv (Rajaswa) And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "1- यह कक ममनननय नयमयमलय परममददश पकक कत कद यमकचकमददश, आददश/ कनदरश कद ममधयम सद यमचन दमरम आरमजन ससखयम 587 रकबम 1.0040 हद०, आरमजन ससखयम 621 रकबम 0.1080, आरमजन ससखयम 627 रकबम 0.0270, आरमजन नमबर 629 रकबम 0.414, आरमजन ससखयम 630 रकबम 0.1320 व आरमजन नमबर 903 रकबम 0.461 एवस आरमजन नमबर 911 रकबम 0.263 हद0 व आरमजन ससखयम 312 सससत ममजम ककदई, परगनम पचकतर, तहसनल कमससममबमद जनपद गमजनपपर मम कनकहत यमचन कद हक कहससद कक अलग करकद कबजम दखल पदमन ककयद जमनद हदतप समबसननत कक आददकशत/ कनदरकशत करनद एवस यमचन दमरम उपसजलमसनकमरन, तहसनल कमससममबमद, जनपद गमजनपपर कद समक पसतपत आवददनपत कदनमसककत 02.02. 2024, जक अकनसतमररत हह, कक अकवलमब कनसतमररत ककयद जमनद हदतप आददकशत / कनदरकशत करनद कक महतन कक पम करम। " 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an order has been passed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 on 10.02.2020 but the has not been given effect to. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati v. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A and Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others) the writ petition is not maintainable for execution of orders passed by Revenue Court. It has been further submitted by learned Standing Counsel that in view of provisions of paragraph no. 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, the petitioners have remedy for getting the order implemented. For ready reference, paragraph no. 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, is quoted as under: "460. Execution of decree and order- (1) The decree or order passed under the Code or the Rules framed under the Code shall, mutatis mutandis, be executed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter V. (2) The Assistant Collector/Tahsildar passing the order for eviction or recovery of any amount of damages or compensation under the provisions of Section 67 of the Code shall get the order executed and in execution of the order he shall, mutatis mutandis, follow the procedure laid down in paragraphs 137 and 138." 5. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to pursue the remedy as available to them under the U.P. Revenue Court Manual. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad