Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4327 (RAJ)

SUDARSHAN LAL RASTOGI S/O LATE SHRI K.L. RASTOGI v. SHRI BHASKAR A. SAWANT I.A.S. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

CCP/147/2019 · 2025-02-04

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4874-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 147/2019 In D. B. Civil Contempt Petition no. 1980/2017 In D. B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 663/2015 1. Sudarshan Lal Rastogi S/o Late Shri K.l. Rastogi, Aged About 69 Years, R/o Dwarikapuri Jamnalal Bajaj Marg Chomu House Jaipur 2. Premchand Agarwal S/o Shri Bishambhar Dayal, Aged About 66 Years, R/o 48 Prathvi Nagar Naya Kheda Ambabari Jaipur 3. Balwant Singh Yadav S/o Shri Raghuveer Singh, Aged About 69 Years, R/o 7-A Maharaja Colony Behind Pnb Dhehar Ke Balaji Jaipur 4. Smt. Kusumlata Kala W/o Shri N.k. Kala, Aged About 73 Years, R/o Plot No. 12 Tetarwal Bhawan Dr. Habib Gandhi Path Vaishali Nagar Ajmer Road Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Bhaskar A. Sawant I.a.s. Principal Secretary To The Govt., Department Of School/secondary Education Secretariat Jaipur 2. Shri Nathmal Didel I.a.s. Director/commissioner Senior/ Secondary School Education, Govt. Of Raj. Bikaner 3. Shri Pushpendra Khandelwal Secretary Managing Committee, Khandelwal Senior Secondary School Station Road Ganga Mata Mandir Jaipur 4. Shri Chandra Manohar Batwara Head, Khandelwal Vaish Hitkarni Sabha Ganga Mandir Station Road Jaipur 5. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To The Govt., Department Of School/secondary Education Secretariat Jaipur ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:4874-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-147/2019] For Petitioners : Mr. Ishwar lal Jain, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Additional Advocate General Mr. Ankul Gupta, Advocate HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 04/02/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Management would submit that according to respondent-Management, amount due and payable to the petitioners has been paid. The said statement is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. In that view of that matter this contempt petition is closed with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the computation by separately constituted petition. 3. Rule is discharged. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ MANOJ NARWANI-YOGESH /34