Pulivarthi Meghana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
CRLP/4968/2023 · 2025-04-07
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43268 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43268 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV^ TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO rpiMiMAI PETITION NO: 4968 OF 2023 O [O a Between: Visakhapatam City. ...Petitioner/Defacto Complainant AND of Andhra Pradesh, through S.H.O., by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Amaravati. ...Respondent/Complainant
1. The State Visakhapatnam City, rep. Ramesh Naidu S/o A.Narayana Swamy Naidu, aged about 53 . Se Employee r/o D.No. 10-27/1, Plot No. B70, Nalanda
2. Anantha years, occ Nagar II Cross Tirupati Urban, Anantha Yoqa Srinivas, S/o A.Ramesh Naidu. Aged about 25 years, occ Studlntf/o D No. io-27/1, Plot No. 870, Nalanda Nagar II Cross Tirupati Urban. ...Respondents/Accused Nos. 2 & 4 under Section 439{2) of Cr.P.C praying circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, bail granted to the respondent/accused Nos. 2 and 4 in CrI.M.P.No. 1549 of 2023 in FIR No. the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court- that in the Petition High Court pleased to cancel the the 15/2022 dt. 27-6-2023 on cum-VI Addl. District Judge, Visakhapatnam. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Smt S V Indira, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of
the Respondent No.1 and of Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 & 3 The Court made the following order:
APHC010342322023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4968/2023 Between: Pulivarthi Meghana ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.S VINDIRA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant{S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.K B RAMANNA DORA The Court made the following:
ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to the unofficial respondents herein/A2 and A4 vide
order dated 27.06.2023 in Crl.M.P.No.1549 of 2023 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court-cum-VI Additional District Judge, Visakhapatanam.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent No.1/State.
2
3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor conducting investigation in the present crime filed charge sheet. As seen from the record, the pri committed by the petitioner is under Section 498-A submits that police after
4. prime offence alleged to have been of the Indian Penal Code.
5. In view of the submission Prosecutor, the learned counsel for the be closed as the charge sheet has been filed. made by the learned Assistant Public petitioner submits that the petition may
6. Recording the said submissions the Criminal Petition is closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T' //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER WsaklflpS"''®®' Court-cum-VI Addl. District Judge,
2. One CC to Smt S V Indira, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra
5. Two CD Copies To, Pradesh. [OUT] RAM
HIGH COURT DATED:08/04/2025
ORDER CRLP.No.4968 of 2023 CLOSING THE CRL.P