1 2025:CGHC:48449-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2942 of 2025 1 - Raj Mohammad Quraishi S/o Rafik Khan Aged About 37 Years R/o Ward No. 07, Nayapara Mahasamund, Police Station, Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) Present Address- C/o Shri James John S/o Jayawamt K. John R/o House No. 27, Imali Bhatha, Near Vrindavan School, Police Station, Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 - Rafik Khan @ Rafik Quraishi S/o Chhedu Khan Aged About 67 Years R/o Ward No. 07, Nayapara Mahasamund, Police Station, Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) Present Address- C/o Shri James John S/o Jayawamt K. John R/o House No. 27, Imali Bhatha, Near Vrindavan School, Police Station, Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Officer-In-Charge Police Station, Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 - Nasrin Quraishi W/o Raj Mohammad Quraishi Aged About 34 Years R/o Ward No. 07, Nayapara Mahasamund, Police Station, Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, Panel Lawyer MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.09.23 10:54:37 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 22.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. Devesh G. Kela, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.1 / State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “1. Quash the F.I.R./Crime No 0243/2025 registered against the Petitioners on complaint made by the Respondent No.2 in Police Station- Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) and the subsequent proceedings (if any) in consequence to the complaint of the Respondent No.2. 2. Stay the further proceedings F.I.R. /Crime No 0243/2025 registered in Police Station- Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.). 3. To grant such other reliefs as it deems fit in the circumstances of the case the interest of justice and to fulfill the purpose and purport of 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.” 3. From perusal of the relief prayed for in the present petition, it transpires that the same is a defective one as the counsel for the petitioner has not mentioned the particulars with respect to the FIR as to under what the charges the FIR has been registered and he has only drafted a vague and sketchy prayer. 4. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh with 3 appropriate prayer and pleadings. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court and the same shall be transmitted to the Government School for Visually Handicapped Boys and Girls , District- Jaspur (C.G.), for wasting the precious time of this Court. 6. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 / State is present. 7. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet