Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3435] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1035/2025 Jasraj @ Jassi S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ladpura Road, Behind Ganesh Temple, Ghughra P.s. Civil Line, District Ajmer. (At Present In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 23/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.212/2024 registered at Police Station Gegal, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 304(2), 351(2) & 111(2)(b) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. Counsel submits that none of the injuries sustained to the injured has been opined as dangerous to life and two injuries which are grievous in nature, has been found on non-vital part of the body. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 02.01.2025 and trial will
[2025:RJ-JP:3435] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1035/2025] take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and especially the fact that petitioner is not named in the FIR; nature of injury; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Jasraj @ Jassi S/o Mohanlal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /237