Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43248 (AP)

M VARALAKSHMI v. V. Govindamma

WA/1086/2024 · 2025-01-23

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010238902024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Writ Appeal Nos: 1086 & 1087 of 2024 Bench Sr.No:-58 [3483] M Varalakshmi and Others ...Appellant(s) Vs. V Govindamma and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Appellant: Mr. Peeta Raman Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): GP for Roads & Buildings CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 8th September 2025 P C : I.A. No.1 of 2025 in W.A. No.1086 of 2024 Having regard to the reasons mentioned in the supporting affidavit, delay of 65 days in representing the present application stands condoned. Accordingly, the application is allowed. I.A. No.1 of 2025 in W.A. No.1087 of 2024 Requirement of filing the certified copy of the order, dated 24.01.2025, passed in I.A. No.2 of 2024 in/and W.A.Nos.1086, 1087 of 2024, is dispensed with. The Interlocutory Application is, accordingly, disposed of. I.A. No.2 of 2025 in W.A. No.1087 of 2024 Having regard to the reasons mentioned in the supporting affidavit, delay of 65 days in representing the present application stands condoned. Accordingly, the application is allowed. I.A. No.2 of 2025 in Writ Appeal No.1086 of 2024 and I.A. No.3 of 2025 in W.A. No.1087 of 2024 We find no merit in the present recall applications, which are, accordingly, dismissed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J akn