HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5039/2024 Suman Meena W/o Ram Gopal Meena, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Bala Ki Dhani, Village Natata, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, Amer, Jaipur. Presently Residing At C-106 Ricco Industrial Area Kukas, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Mr. Manmohan Soni S/o Shri Ghanshayam Soni, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of 176, Krishna Colony, Jain Nasiya Ke Piche, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 3. Ghanshayam Soni S/o Shri Sitaram Soni, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of 176, Krishna Colony, Jain Nasiya Ke Piche, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tushar Panwar Ms. Vinita Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shankar Lal Gurjar Mr. N.S. Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 16/12/2025 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.391/2024 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East), for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 384 and 388 of IPC on the basis of compromise. 2. Complainant, victim and petitioner are present in person and they have duly been identified by their counsel. (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5039/2024] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.391/2024 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J Arun/34