Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43237 (CHH)

ANURAG SHEKHAR SINHA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2786/2023 · 2025-09-02

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:44919-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2786 of 2023 Anurag Shekhar Sinha S/o Late Chandrama Sinha Aged About 43 Years R/o Near Shriram Kirana Store, Safed Khadan Thana Torwa, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Department of Home Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Superintendent of Police Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Station House Officer Police Station Torwa, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. Anjali Sharma D/o Mehendra Sharma Aged About 22 Years R/o Devrikhurd, P.S. Torwa, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Kamlesh Prasad, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, Panel Lawyer. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.09.03 18:00:15 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 03 .09.2025 1. Heard Mr. Kamlesh Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondents No. 1 to 3/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash FIR No. 431 of 2023 registered by the Police Station Torwa, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, and Criminal Proceeding pending before the learned Upper District Judge First Fast Track Special Court Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh in Special Criminal Case (POSCO Act) No. 120 of 2023 against the petitioner and the petitioner may be acquitted from aforesaid offence under Section 376 of the IPC, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the FIR and the consequent criminal proceedings. However, since the learned trial Court has already 3 commenced recording of the prosecution evidence and the trial is at an advanced stage, he seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan