Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43237 (ALL)

MUKESH KUMAR NIMESH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/3134/2016 · 2025-08-20

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143413 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3134 of 2016 Revisionist :- Mukesh Kumar Nimesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Yatindra Kumar Tirpathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Deepak Kumar Kulshrestha,G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision. 3. Sri Deepak Kumar Kulshrestha, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The present revision has been filed by the revisionist- Mukesh Kumar Nimesh with the following prayers: "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 22.09.2016 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Mathura in Misc. Case No.55/2014, Smt. Vimlesh Vs. Mukesh Kumar, U/s 125(3) Cr.P.C., P.S. Refinery, District-Mathura, pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Mathura and allow the present revision, and/or pass such other and further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. It is, further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 22.09.2016 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Mathura in Misc. Case No.55/2014, Smt. Vimlesh Vs. Mukesh Kumar, U/s 125(3) Cr.P.C., P.S. Refinery, District-Mathura, pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Mathura, during the pendency of the present revision before this Hon'ble Court, and/or pass such other and further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, otherwise, the revisionist shall suffer an irreparable loss and injury." 5. Perused the order dated 24.10.2016. 6. The present revision has been preferred by the husband of the opposite party no.2 against the order dated 22.09.2016 by which his application 26(B) and objection 33(B) have been rejected and the application 31(B) and 34(B) of the applicant therein has been allowed and the recovery warrant of Rs. 2,74,000/- has been issued against the revisionist. The order impugned is detailed order considering the matter on merits meticulously. 7. No ground for interference is made out. 8. The revision stands dismissed. 9. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 AS Rathore (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad