APHC010542092024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 28170/2024 Between: 1. KANAGAMAKULA KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O. LATE K.PEDDA VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO. 1-115, BASINIKONDA VILLAGE, BASINIKONDA PANCHAYAT NIMMANAPALLE ROAD, MADANAPALLE (RURAL) ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 2. KANAGAMAKULA CHANDRA SHEKAR, S/O. LATE K.AKKULAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. RESIDING AT DOOR NO. 1-110 BASINIKONDA VILLAGE, BASINIKONDA PANCHAYAT NIMMANAPALLE ROAD, MADANAPALLE (RURAL) ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 3. KANAGAMAKULA SREENIVASULU, S/O. LATE K.AKKULAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. RESIDING AT DOOR NO.9-177 BASINIKONDA VILLAGE, BASINIKONDA PANCHAYAT NIMMANAPALLE ROAD, MADANAPALLE (RURAL) ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 4. KANAGAMAKULA VENKATESH, S/O. LATE K.AKKULAPPA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. RESIDING AT DOOR NO.3- 1, BASINIKONDA VILLAGE, BASINIKONDA PANCHAYAT NIMMANAPALLE ROAD, MADANAPALLE (RURAL) ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR REVENUE SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTI 3. THE JOINTCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 4. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 5. THE TAHSILDAR, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not following the due process of law more particularly under Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977 (Act 9 of 1977) A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Rules, 2007 and the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (30 of 2013) the other and further Statutory Laws being violated by the respondents, thereby stoppage of continuing of encroachments with eviction process against the petitioners us towards to our owned possessing property viz., situated in previously Chittoor District and presently Annamayya District of Madanapalle Mandal Venkappakota Revenue Village Sarkar Punja dry Sy.No.69/2A to the extent of Ac.2.42 cents Full bounded by North Samacheruvu, South Bahuda Vanka, East Land of Sarojamma and others in Sy.No.69/2B, West Bandi Bata on northern side for free accessibility to reach to our lines through Sy.No.68/10, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents pending disposal of the present Writ Petition, that the respondents restrained with stoppage of permissions, approvals of any in nature issued to whomsoever may concern relating to our owned property viz., situated in previously Chittoor District and presently Annamayya District of Madanapalle Mandal - Venkappakota Revenue Village - Sarkar Punja dry Sy.No.69/2A to the extent of Ac.2.42 cents Full bounded by North : Samacheruvu, South: Bahuda Vanka, East : Land of Sarojamma and others in Sy.No.69/2B, West: Bandi Bata on northern side for free accessibility to reach to our lines through Sy.No.68/10 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Otherwise the petitioner will be put to much hardship and irreparable loss, pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of Justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KAMIREDDY ASHOK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 28170 of 2024 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition by granting leave to file fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioners to file fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 12.08.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO W.P.No. 28170 OF 2024 Date: 12.08.2025 SPP