Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4323 (RAJ)

HANUMAN S/O LADURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1017/2025 · 2025-02-21

Uma Shanker Vyas

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:7941] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1017/2025 1. Hanuman S/o Laduram, Aged About 80 Years, R/o Malodi Ki Dhani, Narayanpur, Thana And Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputli-Behror. 2. Budharam S/o Laduram, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Malodi Ki Dhani, Narayanpur, Thana And Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputli- Behror. 3. Kaluram S/o Budaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Malodi Ki Dhani, Narayanpur, Thana And Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputli-Behror. 4. Ramswaroop S/o Budharam, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Malodi Ki Dhani, Narayanpur, Thana And Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputli- Behror. 5. Ramavtar S/o Hanuman, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Malodi Ki Dhani, Narayanpur, Thana And Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputli- Behror. 6. Sundari W/o Budaram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Malodi Ki Dhani, Narayanpur, Thana And Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputli-Behror. 7. Sarwan Devi W/o Hanuman, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Malodi Ki Dhani, Narayanpur, Thana And Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputli- Behror. 8. Sushi W/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Malodi Ki Dhani, Narayanpur, Thana And Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputli- Behror. 9. Rekha W/o Kaluram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Malodi Ki Dhani, Narayanpur, Thana And Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputli-Behror. [2025:RJ-JP:7941] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1017/2025] ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 21/02/2025 The bail application filed by the accused- petitioner Nos.2 & 3 was dismissed as having rendered infructuous vide order dated 11.02.2025. So far as petitioner Nos.1 & 4 to 9 are concerned, learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing at some length, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with liberty to surrender before the concerned Court. Permission as sought for is granted. This bail application filed under Section 438Cr.P.C./482 B.N.S.S. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, if the petitioner Nos.1 & 4 to 9 surrender themselves and file the bail application [2025:RJ-JP:7941] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1017/2025] before the concerned Court, it is expected from the concerned court to decide the bail application of the petitioner Nos.1 & 4 to 9 preferably on the same day, in accordance with law. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J GAURAV SHARMA /382