MEENAKSHI SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/19962/2015 · 2025-07-08
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43224 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43224 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:109306-DB
Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19962 of 2015 Petitioner :- Meenakshi Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Srivastava,Tanu Roopanwal,Vinay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Abhishek Srivastava,C.S.C.,J.N.Maurya,Jai Bahadur Singh,M.C. Chaturvedi,Tanu Roopanwal,Vinay Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Mr. J.N. Maurya, learned counsel for the respondent-Authority is present.
2. In view of the fact that the matter pertains to the year 2015 and in the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad