\HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CCP(S) No.258/2022 In WP(C) No.1552/2021 Shahida Begum Th. Power of Attorney Holder Haji Alam Din, S/o Sh. Hassan Mohd. …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Rajesh Bhushan, Advocate Vs Yasha Mudgal Secretary to the Government Department Of Tourism Civil Secretariat Jammu .….Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Thapa, AAG Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE ORDER (08.08.2025) 1. 1. The compliance report has been filed by the respondent. It has been submitted by the respondent in their compliance report that the claim of petitioner has been considered and the same has been rejected by passing a detailed order bearing No.21-JK(TSM) dated 28.04.2025. A copy of the consideration order has been placed on record by the respondent. 2. In view of the above, the judgment of the Writ Court stands complied with, as such no case for proceeding against the respondent is made out. Serial No. 15 2 CCP(S) No.258/2022 3. The contempt proceedings are closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy against the consideration order. (SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU 08.08.2025 Sneha