[2025:RJ-JP:49890] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.7971/2024 Visiontrade India Innovation Private Limited, Through Its Director Aarti Kumari Office At Second Floor, E-1087, Harijan Basti, Sector-7, Dada Dev Plaza, Palam, South West Delhi, Delhi- 110075. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Gaurav Dhaker, R/o Plot No. 118, Barah Mori, Nahargarh Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neha Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 08/12/2025 1. The present criminal misc. petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the proceedings arising out of the FIR No.320/2024 registered at Police Station Special Offences & Cyber Crime Police Station Commissionerate, Jaipur District Deputy Commissioner Police Offences – Commissionerate, Jaipur for offences under Sections 420, 419, 406 & 120-B IPC and Sections 66C & 66D of IT Act, on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after registration of aforesaid FIR, the complainant has entered into a compromise with the petitioner and now, he does not want to prosecute the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the [2025:RJ-JP:49890] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7971/2024] complainant has appeared before the concerned authority for verification of compromise between the parties and the concerned authority has verified the factum of compromise between them. Learned counsel submits that under the changed circumstances and in light of the compromise between the parties, the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR be quashed. In support of his contentions, he has placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 & State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688 and submit that the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR be quashed. 3. None has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent- complainant. 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and looking to the fact that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and also applying the principles of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and appropriate to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed. Proceedings arising out of impugned FIR No.320/2024 registered at Police Station Special Offences & Cyber Crime Police Station Commissionerate, Jaipur District Deputy Commissioner Police Offences – Commissionerate Jaipur for offences under Sections 420, 419, 406 & 120-B IPC and Sections 66C & 66D of IT Act, against the petitioner stands quashed and set-aside. [2025:RJ-JP:49890] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7971/2024] 7. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 8. The factual report dated 13.02.2025 so furnished by the learned Public Prosecutor is ordered to be taken on record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/217