IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.809 of 2025 ------ 1. Jaynath Yadav, aged about 36 years, 2. Lalu Yadav @ Lalku Yadav, aged about 29 years 3. Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar, aged about 28 years No. 1 to 3 all Son of Jhupar Yadav @ Jhupar Chojhari 4. Jhupar Yadav @ Jhupar Chojhari, aged about 63 years, Son of Bhoch Choudhari 5. Mamta Devi @ Mamta Kumari, aged about 22 years, Wife of Lalu Yadav @ Lalku Yadav 6. Mundari Devi, 62 years, Wife of Jhupar Yadav @ Jhupar Chojhari 7. Baby Devi, aged about 34 years, Wife of Jaynath Yadav, All are resident of Nawadih, Patki, P.O.- Mirzapur, P.S.- Peterwar, Dist.- Bokaro .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Nilesh Kr. Gupta, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Lily Sahay, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 06-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Peterwar P.S. Case No.143 of 2024 instituted under Sections 126, 115, 117, 109, 352 351, 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant by causing injuries on her head. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is further submitted that there is land dispute between the parties, hence, this false case has been foisted with full of exaggerations. It is also submitted that the alleged injuries are not on the vital part of the body of the alleged victim. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-12 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Peterwar P.S. Case No.143 of 2024 with the condition that they will co- operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/