Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43199 (ALL)

VISHNU PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

WRIA/26/2007 · 2025-04-07

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:50473 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 26 of 2007 Petitioner :- Vishnu Pratap Singh And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.P. Tewari,Amit Kumar Shrivastava,Anil Kumar Yadav,Brijesh Kumar Pandey,Girijesh Tiwari,S.S. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K. Shahi,P.S. Sharma Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. None appeared on behalf of petitioners. 2. This writ petition is pending since 2007. 3. Petitioner has approached this Court against impugned order dated 16.09.2006 passed in pursuance of order passed by this Court in earlier round of litigation whereby claim of petitioners and others were rejected as they were not appointed in pursuance of due process. 4. No immediate interim order was passed by this Court. Later on, on 09.03.2011, this writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution though it was restored later on by an order dated 17.02.2014. Thereafter also, matter was listed twice, however, learned advocates for petitioners repeatedly remained absent. 5. Learned counsel for respondents refers contents of present writ petition that reasons assigned in impugned order are not contradicted on basis of any document except vague plea, therefore, there is no reason to interfere with impugned order. 6. In aforesaid circumstances, since there is a reasoned order passed by concerned-respondent as well as that there is nothing substantially mentioned in writ petition. Otherwise also, as learned advocates for petitioners are not even present today, therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution with a cost of Rs. 5000/- to be deposited in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad. 7. Petitioners will be at liberty to file recall/review application, as the case may be, within 8 weeks. 8. Registry will accept the recall/review application only when receipt of cost is annexed along with said application. 9. A copy of this order be supplied to petitioners on their given addresses mentioned in cause title. 10. Registrar (Compliance) to take steps. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Sinha_N. Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad