Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43197 (AP)

VANKAYALAPATI VENU GOPAL v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/35889/2025 · 2025-12-23

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010688552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35889/2025 Between: 1. VANKAYALAPATI VENU GOPAL, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 1/110, CHERUKURU VILLAGE, PAACHUR MANDAL BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-523169. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELLAGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE JOINT SUB REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF DISTRICT REGISTRATION STAMPS GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the acts on the part of the 2nd respondent in kept the representation Dt.21.11.2025 made by the petitioner pending, without passing any orders amounts to erroneous and arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to act upon the representation Dt.21.11.2025 forthwith in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to act upon the representation Dt.21.11.2025 made by the petitioner forthwith in the interest of justice and pending disposal of writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35889/2025 ORDER: 1. The writ petition is filed for the following relief: “...to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the acts on the part of the 2nd respondent in kept the representation Dt.21.11.2025 made by the petitioner pending, without passing any orders amounts to erroneous and arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to act upon the representation Dt.21.11.2025 forthwith in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders....” 2. Upon perusal of the prayer, the writ petition is dismissed for not impleading the affected parties as party respondent, more over the prayer itself is not maintainable. No costs. 3. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt.24.12.2025 BV