Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27132 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition nor any adjournment slip has been moved. However, Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Addl. C.S.C. is present on behalf of the State respondents.
2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
3. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous Interim order, if any, stands vacated
4. In case the petitioner fells that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling of this order within six weeks from today. September 18, 2025 o.k. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar, Sanjiv Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anand Kumar Srivastava, C.S.C. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Kiran Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad