1 2025:CGHC:49252 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 597 of 2020 Gore Lal Yadav S/o Shri Nanki Gend Aged About 37 Years Village Birbhatha, Block Malkharoda, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner. versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Women And Child Development And Social Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Police Station - Rakhi, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Janjgir, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Program Officer, Integrated Child Development Planning Janjgir, District Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Sakti, District - Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 6 - Block Program Officer, Integrated Child Development Planning Malkharoda, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents. For Petitioner : Shri Abdul Moin Khan appears on behalf of Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocates. For State/Respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 6. : Shri Ritesh Giri, Panel Lawyer. AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2025.09.25 17:07:36 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 25/09/2025 1. This Writ Petition has been filed against the order dated 05.10.2019 passed by Respondent No.6 whereby, services of the petitioner as a daily wager was discontinued. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation raising all his grievances before the concerned Authority of the respondents, as the petitioner has rendered sufficient length of service with the respondent/Department as a daily wager, which is not opposed by learned State counsel. 3. In view of the aforesaid, it is directed that if the petitioner prefers a fresh representation within a period of 30 days of this order, the competent Authority of the respondent shall consider and decide the same by a speaking order in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not dealt with the merits of the case and the concerned Authority would be at liberty to decide the representation, on its own merits, in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Avinash