[2025:RJ-JP:50622] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1025/2024 1. Purshottam Son Of Shri Bajrang Lal, Aged About 64 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 6, Bhoteshwar Gate, Kachion Ka Mohalla, Uniara, District Tonk 2. Bhanwar Lal Son Of Shri Madho Lal, (Died) Now Represented By 3. Onkar Son Of Shri Birdhi Chand, R/o 4. Brij Mohan Son Of Shri Kalyan, R/o 5. Radha Kishan Son Of Shri Ram Narayan, R/o 6. Hajari Son Of Shri Bhoora Lal, (Died) Now Represented By 7. Bhanwar Lal Son Of Shri Ghasi Lal, R/o 8. Bhairu Lal Son Of Shri Tulsi Ram, R/o 9. Ram Kumar Son Of Shri Ganga Kishan, R/o 10. Kishan Lal Son Of Shri Bajrang Lal, (Died) Now Represented By 11. Rugh Raj Son Of Shri Bhagreet, (Died) Now Represented By 12. Smt. Narmada Devi Wife Of Late Shri Bhanwar Lal, Resident Of Godo Ki Jhopdi, Uniyara, District Tonk 13. Smt. Gita Devi Wife Of Late Shri Hajari, Resident Of Balithal, Uniyara, District Tonk 14. Smt. Jagdishi Devi Wife Of Late Shri Kishan Lal, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Gothon Ki Jhopdiyaan, Tehsil Uniyara, District Tonk 15. Smt. Kailashi Devi Wife Of Late Shri Rugh Raj, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Ward No.3, Khatikon Ka Mohallah, Uniyara, District Tonk ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jaipur, R.s.e.b. Building Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director 2. Smt. Aparna Arora, Chairman And Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jaipur, Rseb Building, [2025:RJ-JP:50622] (2 of 2) [CCP-1025/2024] Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur 3. Braj Raj Meena, Assistant Engineer (O And M), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Uniara District Tonk ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sarvesh Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 16/12/2025 Learned counsel for the respondents at the very outset, submits that due compliance has been made by the respondents. Considering the submission so made by learned counsel for the respondents, nothing further survives in the contempt petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed. However, in case the petitioners are still aggrieved, they would be at liberty to approach the Court again. Notices stand discharged. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /146