Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:81416 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30572 of 2016 Petitioner :- Sohan Pal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Prasad Dubey,Uday Shanker Upadhyay Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. This Court has passed following order on 09.05.2025:- “1. Two petitioners are before this Court and they have claimed that they have passed U.P. T.E.T. Examination, 2011 and they have submitted their certificates. 2. An exercise was undertaken to verify their respective certificates and since roll number given in certificates were not verified with the result of UPTET-2011 available on website of the Board of High School and Intermediate, their respective appointments were cancelled. 3. Sri Dharmendra Kumar, learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners have not committed any fraud. Their certificates are genuine and it can be verified physically from concerned Board. 4. Court has asked a query whether petitioners have either tried to get it verified from concerned Board or reasons assigned in impugned order that certificates were not verified and their roll numbers were not reflected in result of UPTET-2011 on website of the Board are wrong, but he was failed to show averment in writ petition as no oral argument is either placed in this regard. 5. Still considering that in similar circumstances, a Coordinate Bench of this Court has passed an order in case of Harendra Kumar and others vs. State of U.P. and others, 2024:AHC:146940 to re-verify certificate and matter was remitted back to concerned respondent, the Court is of considered opinion that original records of petitioner be brought before this Court on next date fixed. 6. Learned Additional C.S.C. submits that since this writ petition is pending since 2016, therefore, a chance be given that certificates be verified from original records and he seeks a week's time to place relevant records. 7. It is made clear that after re-verification, if it is found that petitioners have committed forgery, an adverse order may be passed. 8. Considering aforesaid submissions, let this matter come up on 16.05.2025 at 12.00 PM. 9. On next date, learned Additional C.S.C. will carry original records. However, in order to ensure bonafide of petitioners, they are directed to deposit Rs. 50,000/- each before Registrar General through Demand Draft before 4 PM on 12.05.2025. 10. In case aforesaid amount is not deposited till aforesaid time fixed, this writ petition shall be consigned to records.” 2. Sri Dharmendra Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, submits that petitioners are not able to deposit Rs. 50,000/- as directed by this Court. There is no application for modification of order also or an application seeking exemption from depositing of cost. 3. Court also takes note of instructions received by S/Sri R.P. Dubey and Mewalal Gupta, learned counsel for respondents that roll numbers mentioned in respective certificates of petitioners were not allotted to them, therefore, their details are not available on record. 4. Considering aforesaid submissions, this Court does not find ground to consider prayer of petitioners as it is a case where petitioners have submitted forged educational documents to preserve appointment, therefore, writ petition lacks merit, hence, dismissed. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Sinha_N. Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad