1 2025:CGHC:22547 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5849 of 2024 1 - Santaru Kashyap S/o Shri Sarahu Kashyap Aged About 55 Years Caste - Kurmi, R/o Village - Salkhan, Tahsil Shivarinarayan, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector / Additional Collector Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Tahsildar Shivarinarayan, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 5 - Dhelaram S/o Late Rameshar Kashyap Caste - Kurmi, R/o Village - Salkhan, Tahsil Shivarinarayan, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents _____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner :Shri P.M. Shriwas, Advocate For Respondents No.1 to 4/State :Ms. Upsana Mehta, Dy. G.A. For Respondent No. 5 :Shri Prateek Singh Thakur, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Hemant Kesharwani, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUNITA GOSWAMI Digitally signed by SUNITA GOSWAMI Date: 2025.06.06 11:35:01 +0530 2 Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, J Order On Board 05.06.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition (C) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 26.09.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2/Additional Collector, Janjgir Champa in Revision Case No.202302062700374/0636/RXM/A-68/2023-24, whereby the case of the petitioner has been dismissed while affirming the order of Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Janjgir, dated 04/02/2022. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the encroachment on the land in question, i.e. Khasra No. 3365/2, area 0.04 acre of govt. land, situated at village Salkhan, Tahsil Shivarinarayan, District Janjgir Champa, has already been removed by the petitioner and the paddy kept on the said land has also been removed, therefore, he does not want to pursue this petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have raised no objection to the contention made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the above contention made by learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that no grievance survives in the petition. 5. The petition is, accordingly, stands disposed of. 6. I.A.No.2/2025 for urgent hearing and I.A.No.3/2025 for hearing the case during Summer Vacation stand disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE sunita 3