Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040003332025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/66/2025 Nyajum Yinyo and 5 Ors Son of Late Damnyo Yinyo, posted at Govt Upper Primary School, IG Park, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Smti Monya Boje Age: Occupation : Wife of Late Damo Boje presently posted at Govt Upper Primary School IG Park Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Yomto Sora Age: Occupation : Son of Late Koyum Sora presently posted at Govt Upper Primary School Peri Kamki West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Pojar Gamlin Age: Occupation : Son of Late Kopu Gamlin presently posted at Govt Primary School Gemo Tali West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: Smti Larni Tajom Page No.# 2/4 Age: Occupation : Wife of Shri Pojar Gamlin presently posted at Govt Primary School Gemo Tali West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 6: Smti Dagbi Jilen Age: Occupation : Wife of Shri Yitak Jilen presently posted at Govt Primary School Raj Bhawan PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 791111 2:The Commissioner Finance Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Finance Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 3:The Finance Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 4:The Secretary Education Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 5:The Director of Secondary Education Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 6:The Director of Elementary Education Page No.# 3/4 Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Education Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 79111 Advocate for the Petitioner : Dusu Rillung, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (Education),Taba Tagum BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER Date : 02.04.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. A. K. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. N. Ratan, learned Additional Advocate General representing respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. R. Koyu, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department representing respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6. By this interlocutory application, the applicants are praying for condoning the delay of 24 days beyond the period of limitation in filing the connected appeal. It is projected that some time was consumed in obtaining the opinion of the learned counsel and thereafter, to take a decision to file the connected intra- Court appeal. Although, the learned Additional Advocate General as well as learned Standing Counsel, Education Department have opposed this application, considering the ground assigned, the delay of 24 days beyond the period of Page No.# 4/4 limitation in filing the connection appeal is condoned. This interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant