1 2025:CGHC:4351 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 74 of 2025 The District Cooperative Central Bank, Raipur Through Its Chief Executive Officer, G.E. Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus 1 - Khooblal Sahu S/o Shri Mendhuram Sahu Aged About 38 Years Working As D.E.O., Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur Branch Abhanpur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Cooperative, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Registrar, Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Indrawati Bhawan, Block B, 3rd Floor, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advoccate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondents No. 2 to 4: Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. G.A. ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 24/01/2025 1. Heard. 2. This MCC has been filed by the applicant seeking extension of time for further period of 90 days for the compliance order dated 13.09.2024 passed by this Court in WPS No.4885 of 2024. 3. The respondent No.1 filed a writ petition bearing WPS No. 4885 of 2024 2 which was disposed of vide its order dated 13.09.2024 in which the Court made the following observation which is as under:- “It is expected that respondent No.2 shall taken decision on the letters dated 27/09/2021 (Annexure P/5) and 29/01/2022 (Annexure P/6) expeditiously with a period of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. If any adverse order is passed, the petitioner may again approach this Court.” 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits the proceedings to comply with the order passed by this Court is under progress. Therefore, he submits that further 120 days time may be granted to conclude the same. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that this Court directed the respondent No.2 (respondent No. 3 herein) to take decision within 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order. He submits that there is no direction as such to the applicant Bank to take decision in light of the order passed by this Court. 6. From perusal of order it indicates that this Court haps made some observation that respondent No.2 i.e. Registrar (respondent No. 3 herein) to take decision on the letters dated 27/09/2021 (Annexure P/5) and 29/01/2022 (Annexure P/6) expeditiously within a period of 120 days. The order does not reflect that any direction is issued to the Applicant Bank to take any decision. 7. In view of the above, this MCC is dismissed. Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE H. Ansari