Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43163 (ALL)

NITISH PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/11747/2025 · 2025-04-27

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:64829 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11747 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nitish Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sabya Sachee Rai,Suneel Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to pass an appropriate order in order to resolve the dispute of the petitioner for which he has filed his representation on 02.12.2024 so that petitioner may be able to use his property peacefully." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised preliminary objection that the petitioner has moved a miscellaneous application but the proper course for the petitioner is to move an application under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 to get his land demarcated. 4. U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is a self contain Code wherein the petitioner may ventilate his grievance. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 5. In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within two weeks from today, the same may be considered and decided by the concerned court, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months thereafter, in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. 6. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad