IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 439 of 2024 1. Rupa Samanta, W/o Late Vikramjit Samanta 2. Utpal Samanta, S/o Late Ajit Kumar Samanta 3. Chanchal Samanta, S/o Ajit Kumar Samanta 4. Gautam Samanta, S/o Late Ranjeet Samanta 5. Anando Samanta, S/o Late Ranjeet Samanta 6. Indrajeet Samanta, S/o Late Sujit Samanta 7. Subhojit Samanta, S/o Late Sujit Samanta All R/o Samanta Campus, near M.L.A Petrol Pump, Kanunogobigha, Charadih, PO, PS & District-Koderma … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma 3. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Koderma 4. The Circle Officer, Chandwara Block, Koderma… Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Kumar Amit, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Saurav Mahto, AC to GP-I ----- 05/02.01.2025 The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent authorities to create online jamabandi in the name of the petitioners being the legal heirs of the khatiyani raiyat Late Uma Devi, in whose favour the land appertaining to Plot No. 686, Khata No. 40 of Mouza-Gaida, Thana No. 20, District-Koderma measuring an area of 23 acres 68 decimals, has been settled by the then zamindar Dalo Kumari, who was the landlord of the said land through Hukumnama dated 12.02.1942. Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the respondent no. 4 – the Circle Officer, Chandwara Block, Koderma to issue rent receipts in favour of the petitioners for the aforesaid land. The petitioners have also prayed for issuance of direction upon the respondent authorities to consider their representations for issuance of online rent receipts with respect to 2 W.P.(C). No. 439 of 2024 the aforesaid land. The petitioners have further prayed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no. 2 – the Deputy Commissioner, Koderma either to drop or dispose of the proceeding under Section 4(h) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 against the petitioners vide Suspicious Settlement Case No. 20/2022-22. 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to pursue their grievance before the concerned respondent(s). 3. Considering the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish