Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4316 (AP)

DURU CHITTIBABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1554/2023 · 2025-07-22

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010030342023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 1554/2023 Between: 1. DURU CHITTIBABU, S/O DURU BHIMANNA DORA, AGE. 36 YEARS R/O PULUSU MAMIDI LOGUPARTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM, DISTRICT. 2. SANTHARI UDAYESWARA RAJU, S/O MSANTHARI, AGE.41 YEARS, R/O VTC SANTHARI, HUKUMPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM. DISTRICT. 3. VANABANGI SATYANARAYANA, R/O V. POTHU RAJU, AGE. 40 YEARS, R/O RAJU PAKALA, BARIKA DORAPAKALU, CHINTHAPALLI MANDAL , VISAKHAPATNAM. DISTRICT. 4. PODDU NELAMBAR, S/O LAKSHMNAIAH, AGE. 37YEARS R/O CHAMPI ARAKUVALLI, VISHAKAPATNAM, DISTRICT -531149 5. SETTI APPLAKONDA, S/O CHERUKUBINDDA AGE.42 YEARS, R/O GUMMA POST, ANANTHAGIRI, VISHAKAPATNAM, DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HEALTH, MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. COMMISSIONER, HEALTH, MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE, 5TH FLOOR, ONE CENTER, APIIC TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DIRECTOR, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, 3RD FLOOR, ONE CENTER, HIMAGNA TOWERS, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALLURI SITARAMARAJU DISTRICT, PADERU. 5. DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, ALLURI SITARAMARAJU DISTRICT, PADERU. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings of 5th respondent in Rc.No. 117/A2/DMH0/2022 dated 15.12.2022 thereby transferring the petitioners from their appointed work stations to new workstations contrary to their appointment orders, though they are not regular employees and not governed by the APCCA Rules, not provided with DA and HRA alike with regular employees, without considering their representation dated 05.12.2022 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to APCCA Rules and set aside the same and consequently grant stay of operation of proceedings of the 5th respondent in Rc.No. 117/A2/DMHO/2022 dated 15.12.2022 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of operation of proceedings of the 5th respondent in Rc.No. 117/A2/DMHO/2022 dated 15.12.2022 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. JAYA PRAKASH MADASU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following: 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.1554 of 2023 ORDER: Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that in view of further developments, the cause in the writ petition does not survive. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 23.07.2025 KLP