1 2025:CGHC:32365 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 36 of 2019 1 - Laxmi Mandal W/o Ratan Mandal Aged About 30 Years R/o Village M.P.V. 82, Malavaram, District Malkangiri (Odisha) 764087., District : Malkangiri *, Orissa 2 - Rahit Mandal S/o Ratan Mandal Aged About 7 Years (Minor), Represented Through Mother And Legal Guardian Laxmi Mandal, R/o Village M.P.V. 82, Malavaram, District Malkangiri (Odisha) 764087., District : Malkangiri *, Orissa 3 - Rahul Mandal S/o Ratan Mandal Aged About 6 Years (Minor), Represented Through Mother And Legal Guardian Laxmi Mandal, R/o Village M.P.V. 82, Malavaram, District Malkangiri (Odisha) 764087., District : Malkangiri *, Orissa 4 - Rebti Mandal S/o Harendranath Mandal Aged About 65 Years R/o Village M.P.V. 82, Malavaram, District Malkangiri (Odisha) 764087., District : Malkangiri *, Orissa 5 - Shobharani Mandal W/o Rebati Mandal Aged About 60 Years R/o Village M.P.V. 82, Malavaram, District Malkangiri (Odisha) 764087., District : Malkangiri *, Orissa ... Appellants versus 1 - Babu Mandal S/o Prabhas Mandal R/o Bengali Camp Ward No. 3, Kiandl, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh. (Registered Owner Of Vehicle C.G. -20-H-0310), District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shriram General Insurance Company Limited E.B.E.P.I.P. R.I.I.C.O. Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaypur (Rajasthan) 302022 India, At Present Branch Office Maruti Heights Mahoba (Insurer Of Vehicle C.G. - 20-H-0310) Insurance Policy No. Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2025.07.14 14:32:04 +0530 2 10003/31/16/395753, Insured From 26.11.2015 To 25.11.2016), District : Jaipur, Rajasthan ... Respondents (Cause-title, as taken from CIS) For Appellants : None. For Respondents : None. (Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 11/07/2025 1. On previous date of hearing, none appeared for the appellants. Even today, despite repeated calls, neither the appellants appeared nor represented by any counsel. In this circumstance, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the Misc. Appeal (C) is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Pathak/-