Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43151 (AP)

KATTAMREDDY RAJA REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/27979/2025 · 2025-10-16

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010513492025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 27979/2025 Between: 1. KATTAMREDDY RAJA REDDY, S/O.RADHAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. BHEEMAVARAM VILLAGE, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMETRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SULLURUPET, TIRUPATI DISTIRCT. 4. TAHSILDAR, NAIDUPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. R CHENCHULAKSHMI, W/O. SIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D. NO. 4-14, MALLAVARI PALEM, CHERIVI VILLAGE, SATYAVEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents more particularly 4th respondent in proposed to deleting the petitioner name from online revenue record in respect to the petitioner’s agricultural landed property admeasuring with an extent of Ac. 0.7400 cents and covered by survey No. 178/8 and same was situated at Menakuru Village in Naidupet Mandal of Tirupati District, without issuing any notice and without following any known procedure established by law as enshrined under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and declare the same as high handedly 2 illegal, arbitrary, capricious manner and un constitutional and violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to restore petitioner name in online web land revenue records such as Pattadar Adangal/pahanies and I-B Namuna (ROR) register being maintained by the 4th respondent forthwith and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 27979 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition and endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 17.10.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:27979 of 2025 Date : 17.10.2025 SPP