MAYA BALASAHEB @ BALU JAGTAP v. ARUN SHAHAJI JAGTAP AND ORS
WP/1664/2021 · 2025-01-31
Shri Amit Borkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43146 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43146 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
99-wp1664-2021.doc VRJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1664 OF 2021 Maya Balasaheb Alias Balu Jagtap … Petitioner V/s. Arun Shahaji Jagtap & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Kuldeep Nikam with Nishi Singhvi and Devesh S. for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay A. Joshi for respondent No.1. Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, AGP for the State. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JANUARY 31, 2025 P.C.:
1. Challenge in this writ petition arises out of mutation entries in a proceeding under Section 149 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. On perusal of the record, it is evident that the petitioner has filed the civil suit claiming ownership with the properties in dispute. Therefore, it is clarified that the parties’ rights will be governed by the decision in Regular Civil Suit No.26 of 2021.
2. With above clarification, the writ petition stands disposed of.
3. It is made clear that this Court has not considered merits or demerits of substantive rights of the parties in relation to ownership.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1 VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Digitally signed by VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Date: 2025.01.31 19:30:04 +0530