1 2025:CGHC:46619 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7282 of 2025 Ramgahan Yadav @ Bablu S/o Atmaram Aged About 22 Years Occupation- Labour, R/o Village- Kardana Police Station Batauli, District- Surguja (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Batauli, District- Surguja (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Ms. Seema Verma, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 11.09.2025 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 60/2025, registered at Police Station - Batauli, District- Surguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 69 of Bharartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. The prosecution's case is that on 06.06.2025, the victim lodged a written report at Batauli Police Station, alleging that she had become PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.09.12 10:48:18 +0530 2 acquainted with the applicant while unmarried, and they would talk to each other. During their conversations, the applicant assured her of marriage. However, her parents arranged her marriage to someone else, and she lived with her in-laws for about a month before returning to her parental home. While living with her parents, the applicant would visit her, and in 2018, he stayed at her house and allegedly committed sexual intercourse with her under the promise of marriage. This continued, resulting in pregnancy, which was terminated after the applicant administered medication to her. On 23.03.2025, the applicant took the victim to his house, but two days later, he abandoned her without any information, prompting her to lodge the report. Based on her report, FIR No. 60/2025 was registered against the applicant. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the victim is a married woman, and she had a consensual relationship with the applicant for the past eight years. During this period, a love affair developed between them, and a physical relationship was established between both of them, but the relationship could not be materialized, hence, she filed the FIR and she is the consenting party. It is also submitted that the applicant has no previous criminal antecedents, the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. The applicant is in jail since 20.06.2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail 3 application and submits that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case. It is further submitted that the applicant has committed sexual intercourse with the victim on the pretext of marriage. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled for grant of regular bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation made against the applicant and period of detention in jail, and from the perusal of the statement, it transpires that the victim is a married woman, and she had a consensual relationship with the applicant for the past eight years, during this period, a love affair developed between them, and a physical relationship was established between both of them, but the relationship could not be materialized, hence, she filed the FIR and she is the consenting party and further the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal antecedents, the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case and the applicant is in jail since 20.06.2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time, hence, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant - Ramgahan Yadav @ Bablu involved in Crime No. 60/2025, registered at Police Station - Batauli, District- Surguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 69 of Bharartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court 4 concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the 5 applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti