SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/50744/2025 · 2025-09-22
Subhas Mehla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43142 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43142 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-50744-2025 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
127
CRM-M-50744-2025
Date of Decision : 22.09.2025
SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA
…. PETITIONER V/S
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
…. RESPONDENTS
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana.
**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)
1.
The present case was filed in the registry and the registry had raised certain objections which were not removed by the learned counsel.
2.
As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V. of Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, a case wherein objections have been raised by the Registry, the same is to be taken back by the counsel/party concerned, to be re- filed within a period of 40 days.
3.
Since the case file was not taken back for doing the needful by the
learned counsel concerned, despite a specific note having been given in the cause list requesting the counsel to collect the case file for removal of objections, the Registry has listed this incomplete matter before this Court.
4.
In view of the fact that no steps were taken by the counsel concerned for re-filing of the case after removal of objections, no order is called for on the judicial side and the instant incomplete matter stands disposed of. Registry is
directed to weed out the incomplete paper-book as per the Rules.
(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 22.09.2025 Anju
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable
: Yes/No Anju Goel 2025.09.24 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh