Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43138 (RAJ)

MAHAVEER SON OF SUGNA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLR/1889/2025 · 2025-12-18

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51336] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1889/2025 Mahaveer Son Of Sugna, Resident Of Borada, Police Station Sarwar, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor, Kekri, District Ajmer. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kumar Maheshwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 18/12/2025 1. The present revision petition has been filed by the accused- petitioner against judgment dated 31.07.2025 passed by the Court of Additional District and Session Judge, No.1, Kekri (Ajmer), whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against judgment and order dated 03.06.2017 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sarwar, District Ajmer, whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced for offences punishable under Sections 341/34 and 384/34 of the IPC has been partly allowed and the petitioner has been extended benefit of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the revision petition on merits and confines his prayer that time granted for submitting the bail bonds be increased. [2025:RJ-JP:51336] (2 of 2) [CRLR-1889/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has no objection in not pressing the present revision petition on merits as well as for increasing the time to submit the bail bonds. 4. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to furnish the bail bonds pursuant to judgment dated 31.07.2025 passed by the learned Appellate Court within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this Order. 5. So far as, the present revision petition on merits is concerned, same is dismissed as not pressed. 6. Any other pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J SOURAV /33