1 2025:CGHC:47952 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10813 of 2025 1. Prateek Kujur S/o Fuljencius Kujur Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Odka, Block Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.) 2. Kalpnath Kashyap S/o Ramnath Kashyap Aged About 31 Years R/o Chhatrapati Shivaji Ward 35, Near Panchayat Bhawan, Tetarkhutipara, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) 3. Aparna Gauraha D/o Dilip Gauraha Aged About 31 Years R/o Jorapara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Vijay S/o Hemant Dansena Aged About 34 Years R/o Indira Nagar, Ward No. 10, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5. Pitamber Banjare S/o Rajendra Banjare Aged About 28 Years R/o House No. 39, Dabha, Satnam Para Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 6. Murlidhar Nayak S/o Madan Nayak Aged About 31 Years R/o House No. 51, Jogitarai, Nayaktand, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Higher Education Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Upper Director Higher Education Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. Coordinator Selection Committee, Directorate Of Higher Education, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 5. Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Raipur, Through Exam Controller, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.09.19 10:29:28 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravikar Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, Government Advocate For Respondent No. 5 Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 18.09.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to challenge the final merit list as well as appointment order if any issued by the respondents for the post of Lab Technician in Higher Education Department. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioners. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish