Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43122 (RAJ)

SMT. NEELAM PRABHAKAR W/O SHRI SUNIL PRABHAKAR v. MAHENDRA GOSWAMI S/O SHRI SHAMBHUDAYAL GOSWAMI

CW/4930/2023 · 2025-11-17

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46313] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4930/2023 Smt. Neelam Prabhakar W/o Shri Sunil Prabhakar, R/o House No. 2-B-34, Talwandi, Kota, Rajasthan, Presently Residing At B-34, Street No. 4, Avdhoot Society No. 1 Bharuch, District Bharuch, Gujarat. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Mahendra Goswami S/o Shri Shambhudayal Goswami, R/o Village Delunda, Tehsil Taleda, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Chelbihari S/o Shri Sitaram, R/o Ganpati Residency, Near Railway Crossing, Bundi Road, Kota, Rajasthan Through Power Of Attorney Mahendra Goswami S/o Shri Shambhudayal Goswami, R/o Village Delunda, Tehsil Taleda, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 3. Prahlad Gurjar S/o Gopal Gurjar, R/o Ghode Wale Baba Chauraha, Kacchi Basti, Kota, Rajasthan. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Tehsil Ladpura, Kota, Rajasthan. 5. Krishna Devi W/o Shri Narendra Singh, R/o Village Bapcha, Tehsil Chabra, District Baran, Rajasthan. 6. Jagdish Pancholi S/o Indra Kumar Pancholi, R/o Opposite Afeem Godown Gate, Retwali, Kethunipole, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19747/2022 Smt. Swarn Prabhakar W/o Late Shri Kuldeep Raj, R/o House No. 2-B-34, Talwandi, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Mahendra Goswami S/o Shri Shambhudayal Goswami, R/o Village Delunda, Tehsil Taleda, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Chelbihari S/o Shri Sitaram, R/o Ganpati Residency, Near Railway Crossing, Bundi Road, Kota, Rajasthan Through Power Of Attorney Mahendra Goswami S/o Shri Shambhudayal Goswami, R/o Village Delunda, Tehsil Taleda, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 3. Prahlad Gurjar S/o Gopal Gurjar, R/o Ghode Wale Baba Chauraha, Kacchi Basti, Kota, Rajasthan. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Tehsil Ladpura, Kota, Rajasthan. 5. Krishna Devi W/o Shri Narendra Singh, R/o Village Bapcha, Tehsil Chabra, District Baran, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:46313] (2 of 3) [CW-4930/2023] 6. Mukut Bihari Suman S/o Chitarlal, R/o Iqbal Light Wale Ke Pass, Govind Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan. 7. Shambhu Dayal Suman S/o Chitarlal, R/o Iqbal Light Wale Ke Pass, Govind Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4941/2023 Sunil Prabhakar S/o Late Shri Kuldeep Raj, R/o House No. 2-B- 34, Talwandi, Kota, Rajasthan, Presently Residing At B-34, Street No. 4, Avdhoot Society No. 1, Bharuch, District Bharuch, Gujarat. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Mahendra Goswami S/o Shri Shambhudayal Goswami, R/o Village Delunda, Tehsil Taleda, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Chelbihari S/o Shri Sitaram, R/o Ganpati Residency, Near Railway Crossing, Bundi Road, Kota, Rajasthan Thorugh Power Of Attorney Mahendra Goswami S/o Shri Shambhudayal Goswami, R/o Village Delunda, Tehsil Taleda, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 3. Prahlad Gurjar S/o Gopal Gurjar, R/o Ghode Wale Baba Chauraha, Kachhi Basti, Kota, Rajasthan. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Tehsil Ladpura, Kota, Rajasthan. 5. Jagdish Pancholi S/o Shri Indra Kumar Pancholi, R/o Afim Godam Gate Ke Samne, Retwali, Kethunipol, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Banwari Singh & Mr. Rahul Kumar for Mr. Siddharth Bapna For Respondent(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 17/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the parties have settled the dispute, and in terms of that settlement, the main suit has been [2025:RJ-JP:46313] (3 of 3) [CW-4930/2023] withdrawn. Therefore, the present writ petitions have become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not seriously dispute the said submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. In view of the submissions so advanced, the present writ petitions are dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 4. However, it is made clear that the petitioners shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the petitions, if the cause of action still survives, subject to applicable law. 5. Any other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-47-49