ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI DHANI RAM SHARMA v. UNION OF INDIA
CW/19269/2025 · 2025-12-08
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43107 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43107 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49960] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19269/2025 Ashok Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Dhani Ram Sharma, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Village Dhrampura, Post Khirari, District Mathura (U.p.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Union Of India, Through Director General, Railway Protection Force, Railway Board, New Delhi.
2. The Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saxena For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 08/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is therefore, humbly respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly allow this writ petition and the following appropriate writ,
order or directions may kindly be issued against
the
respondents. That respondent may kindly be directed to made proper pay fixation of the petitioner by granting him the benefit of third selection scale/ACP on completion of 30 years' services w.e.f. 2019 and accordingly, by making proper pay fixation, arrears may be released to the petitioner along with 18% interest from the date it become due to date, it should be paid.
[2025:RJ-JP:49960] (2 of 2) [CW-19269/2025] Any other order relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be passed in the facts and circumstances of the case. If any prejudicial order to the interest of the petitioner is passed during the pendency of the writ petition, same may kindly be taken on record and be pleased to quashed and set aside.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /290