RAHUL DAGUR SON OF SHRI RAMESH CHAND DAGUR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/7681/2025 · 2025-12-18
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43101 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43101 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:51211] (1 of 2) [CRLMP-7681/2025] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7681/2025
1. Rahul Dagur Son Of Shri Ramesh Chand Dagur, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Hukmikheda, Tehsil And Police Station Suroth, District Karoli (Raj.)
2. Kuldip Dagur Son Of Shri Bhagat Singh, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Hukmikheda, Tehsil And Police Station Suroth, District Karoli (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2. Tarachand Mehra Son Of Late Shri Ramlal, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 80, Surya Nagar, Ganesh Marg, Police Station Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Arjun Mehra Son Of Shri Tara Chand, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 80, Surya Nagar, Ganesh Marg, Police Station Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Govind Mehra Son Of Shri Tara Chand, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 80, Surya Nagar, Ganesh Marg, Police Station Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Balveer Singh Beniwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Deepak Mehra, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 18/12/2025
1. Parties are present in person and they have duly been identified by their respective counsel.
2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.550/2025 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 352, 3(5) & 126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023.
[2025:RJ-JP:51211] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7681/2025]
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.550/2025 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /221