IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ;: AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI / WP(AT) NO: 1108 OF 2021 ^ miM m f-m ♦ Between: T. Srinivasulu, S/o Ramaiah, aged about 45 years, Dy. Tahasildar (Elections), O/o Tahasildcir, Badvel mandal, Y.S.R.Kadapa Dist. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The District Collector, Y.S.R.Kadapa district at Kadapa. 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Govt, of A.P., At Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept., Secretariate, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist. X ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the , impugned Ref.No.AI/923/2014 dt.31.08.201 tissued by the 1st respondent and its consequential Proc.CLA's Proc. No.VSI(3)/1169/2015 dt.21.07.2017 issued by the 2nd .respondentand set aside' as it is a major punishment and the same as illegal, unjust and consequently hold that the ,two increments are entitled t^be restored to the applicant with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the PetitionerSRI M RAMGOPAL RAO . Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010410242021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH QMS [3311] AT AMARAVATI m (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday ,The Seventeenth Day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms Justice B S Bhanumathi Writ Petition Transfered from APAT NO: 1108 of 2021 (O.A.No.2648 of 2017) Between: T Srinivasulu ...Petitioner AND The District Collector and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M Ramgopal Rao Counsel for the Respondents: 1.GP for Services I ...Respondents The Court made the following Order : The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking the following relief; “...to call for the records relating to the impugned Ref No.Al/923/2014 dated 31.08.2015 issued by the 1 respondent and its consequential Proc.CLAs Proc.No.VSI(3)/1169/2015 dated 21.07.2017 issued by the 2^^ respondent and set aside as it is a major punishment and the same as illegal unjust and consequently hold that the two increments are entitled to St W.P(AT) No. 1108 of 2021 2 ^6^ restored to the applicant with all consequential be benefits...” No representation for the petitioner today inspite of posting under the caption ‘for dismissal’ as there was no 2. the matter representation on 23.01.2025 and 05.03.2025. Ram Manohar, learned Assistant Government Sri.Voyyuru Pleader for Services-I is present. Hence the present writ petition is There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand 3. dismissed for default. 4, 5. closed. Sd/- K.KASI RAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. M RAMGOPAL RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCS to GP FOR SERVICES I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three C.D.Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED: 17/03/2025 ORDER WP(AT).No.1108 of 2021 ^ 1 n JUL 2025 Current Section * ^ % e» DISMISING THE WP(AT) FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS