[2025:RJ-JP:4464] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1050/2025 Yashvant S/o Kaluram, R/o Dhani Rudawali, Tan Gram Jairampura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc. 3rd Bail Application No. 1051/2025 Kamlesh Kumar S/o Jawahar Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dhani Navodi Tan Village Ralavata, Police Station Khandela, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined District Jail Sikar) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 272/2024 registered at Police Station Srimadhopur, District Neem Ka Thana for offences u/S 115(2), 126(2), 76, 189(2), 351(2), 331(6) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:4464] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1050/2025] 2. The second bail application of accused petitioner Kamlesh Kumar was dismissed vide order dated 15.10.2024 with liberty to file fresh after examination of the prosecution witnesses namely; Smt. Supyar Devi, Kumari Reetu, Kailashchand and Moolchand. 3. Heard. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the challan papers as well as the statements of the witness examined so far. 5. On perusal of the statements of the prosecution witness, it has come out that PW-1- Smt. Supyar Devi, PW-2- Moolchand & PW-3-Kailashchand have not supported the prosecution story and turned hostile. In the statements of the prosecution witness Kumari Reetu-PW-4, it has come out that there was a compromise between the parties. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioners so also the fact that 3 of the material prosecution witnesses have turned hostile and the accused petitioners are in custody for last about four months, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the [2025:RJ-JP:4464] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1050/2025] matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. Let a copy of this order be placed in connected file/s. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /443-444