1 2025:CGHC:11362-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3176 of 2024 Dr. Pravin Rustam Rao Borde S/o Rustam Rao Borde Aged About 40 Years R/o Flat No. 202, 2nd Floor, Mahalaxmi Apartment, Beed Bypass, Aurangabad (MH). ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Thorugh- The Officer In Charge, Police Station Dindayal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Vinita Jha W/o Mukesh Jha Aged About 32 Years R/o Kailashpuri Near Yogmata Mandir Tikrapara Raipur Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Mukesh Jha S/o Ayodhya Datt Jha Aged About 43 Years R/o Kailashpuri Near Yogmata Mandir Tikrapara Raipur Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Ashish Tiwari S/o Madan Mohan Tiwari, Aged About 43 Years R/o Sector- 10, Civik Center, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Niraj Baghel, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate For Respondents No. 2 to 4 : Ms. Pushpa Gupta, Advocate Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble S hri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 07/03/2025 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing/setting aside the FIR No. 0462/2023, dated 12.10.2023, registered at Dindayal Police Station, District Raipur under Section 420 of the IPC, 1860 and all consequential proceedings arising out of or emanating therefrom. 2. The petitioner has filed the present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition with the following relief: “A. Allow the present Petition and quash the impugned FIR No. 0462/2023 dt. 12.10.2023 [P.S. Dindayal Raipur] registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 as well as all if any consequential proceedings arising out of or emanating therefrom; and B. Any other order(s) that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and necessary in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the charge sheet has been filed and as such she want to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to take recourse to law to challenge the charge sheet. 4. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel. 3 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, that the charge sheet has been filed in the matter, the present CRMP stand dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to take recourse to law to challenge the charge sheet, if so advised. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ved