[2025:RJ-JP:50047] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18463/2025 Bhoor Singh Machiwal Son Of Shri Jamuna Lal, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of 48, Gayatri Nagar, Karauli. Presently Holding The Post Of Senior Nursing Officer At General Hospital, Karauli. (Employee Id - Rjka198926015051) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department Jaipur. 2. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Joint Director Medical And Health Services, Bharatpur. 4. Principal Medical Officer, General Hospital, Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Iliyas Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/12/2025 1 Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “(i) Order dated 28.03.2024 passed in appeal number 1325/2024 titled as Bhoor Singh Machiwal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii) Order dated 09.02.2024 may kindly be quashed and set aside will all consequential benefits.” 2 Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 07.10.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ [2025:RJ-JP:50047] (2 of 3) [CW-18463/2025] Petition No14986/2025 titled as Bhanwar Lal Saini Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary and Another reported as AIR 2015 SC 2389. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3 Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Bhanwar Lal Saini (supra) passed by this Court. 4 Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5 Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. [2025:RJ-JP:50047] (3 of 3) [CW-18463/2025] 6 With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /273