Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43080 (BOM)

SITARAM HARIBHAU VARPE AND ORS v. ULLHAS CHANDRAKANT VARPE

WP/4887/2023 · 2025-01-21

Shri Amit Borkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19-wp4887-2023.doc AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4887 OF 2023 0 Sitaram Haribhau Varpe & Ors. … Petitioners V/s. Ullhas Chandrakant Varpe … Respondent Mr. Rushikesh C. Barge for the petitioners. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JANUARY 21, 2025 P.C.: 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioners, on instructions from the petitioner who is present in Court, seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition. He states that he be permitted to amend the plaint and thereafter file application for appointment of Court Commissioner. 2. If the petitioners satisfy ingredients of Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Trial Court can consider the application for amendment and shall pass appropriate orders. Thereafter, if the petitioners fulfill ingredients of Order 26 Rule 9 of the CPC, the Trial Court shall decide the application in accordance with law. 3. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1 ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Digitally signed by ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2025.01.21 14:41:53 +0530