CR-2180-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (133) CR-2180-2025 Date of Decision: - 07.04.2025 Nitish Mahajan Petitioner Versus Priyanka Verma and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions and order directing the Principal Judge, Family Court, Patiala to expedite/dispose off the Transfer Application filed by the petitioner. 2. A perusal of the zimni orders would show that on 10.12.2024 the reply to the application under Section 24 of the CPC was filed by the respondent/wife and the case was adjourned to 22.01.2025. On 22.01.2025, 04.02.2025, 19.02.2025 and 05.03.2025, it is the counsel for the petitioner who had prayed for adjournments. The said zimni orders are reproduced as under: - “CNR No.:PBPT010100722024 CIS No: TA/143/2024 DR. NITISH MAHAJAN VS. DR. PRIYANKA VERMA Present: Sh. Rajat Chopra advocate for the petitioner. Sh. N.P.S. Waraich Advocate for the respondent. NARESH KUMAR 2025.04.07 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CR-2180-2025 -2- Arguments not advanced. On request of learned counsel for the petitioner, case stands adjourned to 4.2.2025 for consideration on the application application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. Date of Order : 22-01-2025 (Sandeep Kumar Singla) Principal Judge, Family Court Patiala/UID No.PB0118 CNR No.:PBPT010100722024 CIS No: TA/143/2024 DR. NITISH MAHAJAN VS. DR. PRIYANKA VERMA Present: Sh. Rajat Chopra advocate for the petitioner. Sh. N.P.S. Waraich Advocate for the respondent. Arguments not advanced. However, rejoinder filed by the respondent. Copy supplied. On request of learned counsel for the petitioner, case stands adjourned to 19.2.2025 for consideration on the application application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. Date of Order : 04-02-2025 (Sandeep Kumar Singla) Principal Judge, Family Court Patiala/UID No.PB0118 CNR No.:PBPT010100722024 CIS No: TA/143/2024 DR. NITISH MAHAJAN VS. DR. PRIYANKA VERMA Present: Sh. Rajat Chopra advocate for the petitioner. Sh. N.P.S. Waraich Advocate for the respondent. Arguments not advanced. On request of learned counsel for the petitioner, case stands adjourned to 5.3.2025 for consideration on the application application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. Date of Order : 19-02-2025 (Sandeep Kumar Singla) NARESH KUMAR 2025.04.07 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CR-2180-2025 -3- Principal Judge, Family Court Patiala/UID No.PB0118 CNR No.:PBPT010100722024 CIS No: TA/143/2024 DR. NITISH MAHAJAN VS. DR. PRIYANKA VERMA Present: Sh. Rajat Chopra advocate for the petitioner. Sh. N.P.S. Waraich Advocate for the respondent. Arguments not advanced. On request of learned counsel for the petitioner, case stands adjourned to 12.3.2025 for consideration on the application application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. It shall be last opportunity for the same. Date of Order : 05-03-2025 (Sandeep Kumar Singla) Principal Judge, Family Court Patiala/UID No.PB0118” 3. On 12.03.2025 again arguments were not addressed although the counsel for the respondent had sought adjournment and the case was listed for 26.03.2025. The copy of said order dated 26.03.2025 has not been annexed. 4. Keeping in view the above-said facts and circumstances, this Court finds that there is no case made out for directing the Principal Judge, Family Court, Patiala to dispose of the case in a time bound manner and the present revision petition being meritless, deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. ( VIKAS BAHL ) April 07, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.04.07 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement