[2025:RJ-JP:46227] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6817/2025 Anoj Bijarniya @ Anuj S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Heera Nagar, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. K. Vijay, Spcl. PP with Mr. Amitabh Vijaywargia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 17/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 18/2025 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar District Jaipur City-West for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 61(2)(a) of BNS, Section 43, 66 of IT Act and Section 10(1) of the Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that applicant was not actively involved in the alleged offence and has wrongly been implicated in the present matter. It is further submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant and he is ready to abide conditions, if imposed by the Court. 3. Per contra, learned Special Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application and has [2025:RJ-JP:46227] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6817/2025] submitted that provisions of IT Act, Act of Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) are applicable upon the applicant and severe allegations under the same are leveled. It is further submitted that vide an order dated 15.04.2025, learned Trial Court has rejected the bail of the co-accused, named Rajendra Kumar, who was also involved in using unfair means in the Public Examination. Moreover, it is submitted that two witnesses, namely Mangla Ram and Nirmal, also supported the story of the prosecution. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact that no prima facie inference has been drawn; that the allegations of grave nature has been leveled upon the applicant; that facts of the present case are not exceptional and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 5. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /316