IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL j TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE .PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3472 OF 2025 I Between: 1 Bangari Chakradhar @ Chakri, S/o Late Ramappadu, Aged 37 years, Caste SC Relli, R/o JNNURM Colony, Bangaramma Colony, Kotta Agraharam Vizianagaram Town. 2. Vasupalli Shyam Prakash aLlas Shyam Kumar, Boxer Shyam, S/o Late Lakshmana Rao, Aged 30 years. Caste Vadabalija, R/o D.No. 1-15-31, Adarsh Nagar, Ushodaya Junction, Pedda Waltair, Visakhapatnam. Petitioners/Accused 1 & 5 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, (New Sections 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant bail to Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 5 in Crime No. 46/2025 Bheemunipatnam Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, on such terms and conditions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS : SRI. MADHU SUDHAN P COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER APHC010158012025 THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO r-piMiMAi PFTITION NO: 3472/2025 IN [3369] 0;Y.a Between: Bangari Chakradhar @ Chakri and Others AND ...PETlTIONER/ACCUSED(S) ...respondent/complainant He State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitloner/accused(S). 1.MADHU SUDHAN P Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following; ORDER: under Sections 480 & 483 of the Bharatiya This Criminal Petition Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners herein/AI and A5, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.46 of 2025 of Bheemunipatnam Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate. registered against the petitioners and others for the 2. A case has been offence punishable u/Sec.310(2) of B.N.S. 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, the defacto complainant is a resident of Pedda Sariyapalli, Srikakulam District. On 18.01.2025 in the afternoon hours, he received a phone call and he disconnected the same. Again on 19.01.2025 in the morning hours while he was returning from received phone call from the same number and from Narayana school, he the same unknown lady who informed that she is very known to him and 2 enquired his details. She asked him to come to Mudugullu area as she was coming to meet him and that he came to ANITS college junction. When he was waiting there, A1 to A6 approached him and informed that he kidnapped one lady and took him away from there. A4 and A5 took the defacto complainant on a scooty and took him to Raghu engineering college. A1 to A3 followed them on scooty and A6 followed on another scooty. A1 to A6 took the defacto complainant to an isolated place on the left side of Fortune hills lay out, near Raghu engineering college. Then A3 and A6 caught hold of the defacto complainant rightly and detained there, whereas A1 to A6 threatened and beat him. Further A1 fisted on his face and robbed his phone and threatened him to disclose his phonepe password. They took cash of Rs.40,000/- from phonepe app. Thereafter A1 to A6 threatened the defacto complainant with dire consequences not to disclose the said incident to anyone and left him. A1 to A7 hatched a plan and bring the defacto complainant to the isolate place and robbed the money. Basing on the complaint of the defacto complainant, the above said crime was registered and investigated into. Heard. Perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that similarly placed person i.e. A4 has obtained regular bail by this Court in the very same crime, vide order in Crl.P.No.2031 of 2025, dated 27.03.2025. The case of the present petitioners i.e. A1 and A5 is also on the same footing as that of 4. 5. A4. 3 6. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public disputed the correctness of the counsel for the petitioners. In view of the aforesaid facts and ci Prosecutor has also not said submission made by the learned 7. circumstances of the case, since A4 who is on the same fooling as of petitioners herein/AI and A5 was released pertaining to the role played by the would be completed, this Court and A5. on bail and most of the investigation petitioners in the commission of the offence is inclined to grant bail to petitioners herein/A1 In the result, the Criminal Petition i 8. IS allowed with the following conditions; (i) The petitioners herein shall be released on his executing a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two sureties for a like sum each to the Additional Metropolitan satisfaction of the learned XV Magistrate at Bheemunipatnam; (ii) On release, the petitioners shall House Officer concerned appear before the Station on every Sunday between 10.00 and 01.00 p.m., fora period of three (03) months. a.m. (iii) The petitioners shall not tamper with the hamper the investigation and shall evidence and cooperate for investigation. SECT/^ //TRUE COPY// officer For ASSIb I AIM I r\c:v:>io. ■ To. The XV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Bheemunipatnam The Superintendent, Central Jail, Arilova, Visakhapatnam The Station House officer, Bheemunipatnam Police Station, Visakhapatnam City One CC to SRI. MADHU SUDHAN P Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of A.P[OUT] One spare copy 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. / / HIGH COURT TMR,J DATED:08/04/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.3472 of 2025 ALLOWED % o l»o oa Co