Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43061 (RAJ)

GOPAL MEENA SON OF SHRI BABULAL MENNA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/4461/2024 · 2025-03-03

Ganesh Ram Meena

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9212] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4461/2024 Gopal Meena Son Of Shri Babulal Menna, R/o Village Piloda Tehsil Vazirpur District Gangapur City (Rajasthan). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. 2. 3. State of Rajasthan, through P.P. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Udaipur, Aayakar Bhawan, Subcity Center, Savina, Hiran Magri, Udaipur (Rajasthan). Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Office, New Kumawat Bhawan, Near Prakash Talkies, Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents 4. Sunita Meena W/o Shri Shivcharan Meena, R/o Khedla Ki Jhopdi Police Station Sapotra District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 03/03/2025 1. This criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the BNSS with a prayer to quash the FIR No.242/2023 registered at Police Station Udaimod, District Gangapur City on 01.10.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 342, 420, 406 & 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 (Amended 2015). 2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that after thorough investigation in the matter, the Police has proposed a negative [2025:RJ-JP:9212] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4461/2024] final report as it has come out that the dispute between the parties is of civil nature. 3. In view of the statements made by the learned Public Prosecutor, after completion of investigation the Police has submitted negative final report in the matter. The Court feels that no further cause of action survive with the petitioner to pursue this criminal misc. petition. 4. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition, if need so arises in future. 5. Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar/249