[2025:RJ-JP:46265-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1105/2024 1. Brahamdev Gautam S/o Shri Hemprakash, Aged About 37 Years, Resident of Dhakad Mohalla Harnawada, Shahaji, Chhipabarod, Baran, Rajasthan 325221 2. Subhash David S/o Shri Ashok David, Aged About 37 Years, Resident of 1208, Adarsh Nagar, Sector 4, Hiran Magri, Opp. Manshapurn Mahadeo Temple, Udaipur (Raj.) 313002 3. Reena Vishnoi D/o Shri Shankar Lal, Aged About 30 Years, Resident of Mataji Colony, Merta Road, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur, Rajasthan 341511 4. Khushboo Pandya D/o Shri Suresh Chandra Trivedi, Aged About 40 Years, Resident of 32 Ambika Colony, Link Road, Banswara, Rajasthan 327001 ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Kailash Chand Meena, Acting Chairman Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Jaipur Road, Ghooghara Ghati, Ajmer (Raj.) 305001 2. Shri Ram Niwas Mehta, Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Jaipur Road, Ghooghara Ghati, Ajmer (Raj.) 305001 3. State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC), FMP9+9JV, Jaipur Rd, Ghooghara Ghati, Madarpura, Ajmer, Rajasthan 305001. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yuvraj Samant with Ms. Neha Amola, Mr. Tilak Vaid HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 17/11/2025 1. Instant civil contempt petition by and on behalf of petitioners have been filed, alleging the non-compliance of the interim order dated 14.05.2024 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6795/2024, whereunder interim directionwas issued to the [2025:RJ-JP:46265-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-1105/2024] respondents to consider the candidature of petitioners provisionally for appointment on the post of Hospital Caretaker, subject to decision of the writ petitions. 2. In response to the contempt petition, respondents have placed on record an order dated 02.09.2024 passed by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer, whereunder after considering the candidature of petitioners provisionally on merits, their final result has been kept in sealed cover. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that the order impugned has been complied with and after final decision of writ petition, result shall be declared. 4. Undisputedly, the issue of appointment of petitioners on merits, is yet to be adjudicated and writ petition by and on behalf of petitioners are pending for adjudication. 5. In view the order dated 02.09.2024 (Annexure-R1 enclosed with the reply), this Court does not find any disobedience, that too, deliberate and willful, of the interim order dated 14.05.2024,by the respondents. 6. Accordingly,, the civil contempt petition is hereby dismissed, at this stage. 7. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /69