Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43058 (RAJ)

TARUN SAINI S/O JAGDISH PRASAD v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

CW/2367/2021 · 2025-11-11

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45146] (1 of 2) [CW-2367/2021] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2367/2021 Tarun Saini S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ghodafair Circle Behind Rajput Hostel, Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Executive Engineer Of Public Health Engineering Department, Manu Marg, Alwar. 2. Assistant Engineer (A.en), Public Health Engineering Department, Manu Marg, Alwar. 3. Junior Engineer Zone 1st, Public Health Engineering Department, Manu Marg, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/11/2025 This Civil Writ Petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with the following prayer:- (a) Pass an order and direct the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to take necessary action against illegal water connection of private person and lodged FIR. (b) Pass any other order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and also in the interest of justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application was filed by the petitioner before respondent No.2 with [2025:RJ-JP:45146] (2 of 2) [CW-2367/2021] regard to illegal water connection for which inquiry was initiated and vide inquiry report dated 01.05.2018, it was observed that one water connection is illegal. Despite this, no action has been taken by the Department. Counsel submits that several representations have been submitted by the petitioner, but no heed has been paid to his grievance. In view of above, this court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation before respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks from today along with certified copy of this order. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner before respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks from today, respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the same by way of passing a reasonable/speaking order strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of submission of representation. Needless to say that order shall be passed after giving opportunity of hearing to the affected persons. This Court has not passed any observation on the merits of the case and thus, if any representation is filed by the petitioner, same may be decided in accordance with law without being influenced or prejudiced by this order. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /Parshant/12